Roles and Responsibilities in an Oil Spill Incident

The workshop aimed at clarifying the roles and responsibilities of all the organizations involved in an oil spill incident. We focused on these categories of Canada’s Marine Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Regime:

1. prevention;
2. preparedness and response;
3. monitoring and enforcement;
4. liability and compensation.

One of the Fund’s marine experts, Michael Grebler, made a presentation focused on the fourth category. Over the past 33 years, the Fund has received very few claims related to incidents that occurred in the Arctic region. Less than $92,000 was paid out to claimants, representing 0.35% of the total amount paid from the Fund. We are therefore increasing our outreach efforts!

Since 1989, we have thus received only three claims related to Arctic incidents, all of which occurred in Nunavut. Here’s a little background on these claims:

Ship name (year) and location	Amount claimed	Summary
Mystery spill (1999) Ungava Bay, Nunavut	$15,214.92	·       ship sailing through patches of an unknown hydrocarbon near the eastern entrance to Ungava Bay ·       overflights confirmed the existence of an oil slick, which was later dissipated by heavy seas ·       we paid $6,410, plus interest
Clipper Adventurer (2010) Coronation Gulf, Nunavut	$468,801.72	·       cruise ship with 128 passengers and 69 crew on board, grounded on a shoal in the Coronation Gulf, in the Canadian Arctic ·       after being successfully refloated, the cruise ship was towed by tug to Cambridge Bay, for damage assessment and preliminary repairs in preparation for its departure from the Arctic ·       Court found the shipowner liable for the amount of $445,361.64 plus interest. The shipowner paid and we closed the claim.
Nanny (2010) Gjoa Haven, Nunavut	$441,842.17	·       tanker en route to deliver petroleum products to communities in the Arctic ·       went aground on an unchartered shoal of sand and gravel near Gjoa Haven ·       we paid $85,000, inclusive of interest ·       we recovered $70,000 from the polluter

We received good feedback from the participants on our presentation on how to submit a claim following a ship-source oil spill.

Other presentations were provided by the Canadian Coast Guard and Environment & Climate Change Canada.

This workshop allowed for open discussions, and it invited questions and answers from all participants. Participants also identified the additional work required to address community concerns.

Scenario-based Workshop

The workshop used six ship-source oil pollution scenarios likely to happen in Cambridge Bay. Some of these scenarios were built on the two previous incidents (Clipper Adventurer and Nanny). The vessel types ranged from the relatively small spills to the worst-case scenario involving an oil tanker.

The scenarios factored in:

• vessel traffic pattern data;
• consequences of the various types of oil; and,
• local environmental sensitivities.

Oil spills are a major concern in the Arctic due to the additional complexities and delays involved in the logistics, access to oil spill response resources, ice movement, and weather. The workshop aimed at better understanding Canada’s Marine Oil Spill Preparedness and Response Regime. Participants focused on the immediate impacts of an oil spill and how to improve plans for swift action.

Next Steps and Recommendations

The workshop involved participants from different locations and background, with almost a third of the participants being from Inuit communities. Community leaders and local organizations from Cambridge Bay identified the following potential next steps and recommendations:

• improving existing oil spill contingency plans,
• setting up additional exercises to strengthen partnerships and ensure the ability of the community to recover from an actual incident.